Watch Movies »Movie Reviews » Predators Review
Movie Reviews of Predators

  • Predators

    First of all, it's not a reboot as many speculates, it's direct continuation to Predator 1&2, and only AVPs are dismissed but the movie doesn't neglect them altogether, we get to see alien like skulls in the movie, however alien universe is wholly neglected.

    Let's start with the best part of the movie, the acting. It's very rare for a sci-fi movie to contain good acting these days, all gone are the days of Alien/Aliens/Blade runner etc. where the acting used to get all the praise more than action. In Predators, every single character is very believable and delivers. It's astonishing to see the acting of Brody, he deserves an Oscar for his role as Royce more than he did in "The Pianist" as Szpilman. Rest of the cast did very well too, they perfectly fill in their boots as group of elite warriors. It would be fair to say that compared to the original Predator movie, this movie exceeds in the acting department.

    Next comes the story line, it's pretty much based on "The Most Dangerous Game", the story itself is well written and not rushed, it takes time to unfold events, and ample time is given to develop characters. There is really a fear and eerie feeling in the story, and we don't get to see the hunters very often, which adds more thrill and suspense to the story; just like the original flick. To me an unseen threat is more scarier than seeing the perpetrator every minute.

    The music is tense, almost reminiscent of Alan Silversti score in the original. Good thing here is that it's not overdone, and the drum beats are used rightfully when the situation demands it to. Really nice work by the composer.

    As for CGI, it's very minimal and not overdone as well, although not same as the original which is understandable since a lot of progress have been made in graphics department since 80's, take Avatar for example.

    I also want to talk little bit about violence and rating of the movie, it's also not very frequent we get to see spine ripped off and people chopped into half by laser guns these days, had crafty cuts to the movie not been made, this flick could very well been awarded an NC-17 rating.

    Last but not the least, this flick is an instance of how a good movie can be made on a small budget, you don't require big budget for your movie to please audiences, you just need to have a vision thing to make pleasurable flicks for them.

  • The Review of the movie "Predators"
    Unlike the Movies "Aliens vs. Predator" this movie lived to my expectation, although there is no element of surprise like in the first movie, but than again we did not know anything about the creature back then, so you can not blame the writers for that. There is also a homage to the first movie in a couple of scenes and the scenery (the jungle)is almost identical. The actors are also very well picked, but somehow Adrien Brody (an excellent actor) does not fit in "the tough guy uniform" although he did his part well. New type of predators are refreshing as well as the other hostile alien life forms, and the rivalry between the opposite predator clans is also a good idea. On a scale of 1 to 10 I give it a strong 7.

  • I like Sci-fi. I don't care what the critics say, I will go and see this movie! It is just like any other trilogy movies. They make the first one and it rocks, then they scramble to make part 2 and 3. (matrix 3 blew chunks! Don't do that to the heros!!) I've always enjoyed the predator concept. Sure, some of the movies left me feeling like I could have made a better movie. (Pred v. alien series, except first one, Danny Glover could not fist fight a predator but the movie says he could). It is great science fiction for the stories and concepts. Lance Henrikson doesn't make an appearance, does he? I'm just glad I don't have to pay NYC movie prices, $20 to get in, just in case it blows! See ya at the sticky floor place.